Review Format Update

So, after a bit of a trial and error period, we have decided to modify our review format again. We are streamlining things to make it easier on you, the reader, and us, the writers. In addition to the changes below, we will be breaking down reviews alphabetically into only 2 groups (A-L and M-Z). You can find your favorite bands with ease by using the search bar in the upper left corner of the page. (FYI, all reviews posted recently will be re-formatted to the new format).

As you may know, in the past there was little explanation of what our reviews were based upon and our scale was based on the traditional 90% or higher - A, 80-89% - B, 70-79% - C, 60-69% - D, 59% or less - F. Any reviews that have a % out 100% are past reviews using the old format.

The new format, described below, will give more explanation of how albums are critiqued and expose the strengths and weaknesses of each band. The new system will allow the truly special albums to set themselves apart from the average release.

Each of the four categories will be evaluated out of a possible 100, and the four values will carry equal weight in computing the “BSTscore”.

• Musicianship
• Vocals
• Creativity
• Impact
  

Definitions and scale explanation:

• Musicianship – This category will take into account the band’s talent/technical ability and the flow of the songs. Does everything fit together? Does the music fit the band’s abilities?
• 100 – The band has unmatched talent. The songs could not be composed better.
• 80 – Band members have above average talent. Arrangements are strong and tight.
• 60 – The band has average talent. Most of the album is consistent.
• 40 – Most members show average or below average talent. Songs could use work.
• 20 – The band has below average talent. The album should be re-written.

• Vocals – This category will evaluate the vocalist’s ability to deliver lyrics with clarity, range, and key, as well as the songwriter’s ability to convey the band’s message/express feelings.
• 100 – Vocals are unique, flawless, crisp, and clear. Lyrics are unique and meaningful.
• 80 – Vocals and lyrics are strong, powerful, and meaningful.
• 60 – Vocals are adequate, with some flaws. Lyrics are mainstream, somewhat impersonal.
• 40 – Vocals are off-key or muffled. Lyrics are generic.
• 20 – Vocals are incomprehensible. Lyrics are pointless, erratic.

• Creativity – This category compares the album to other releases. Where is this album compared to past releases? To other bands? Is the band pushing any boundaries?
• 100 – Genre defining, groundbreaking.
• 80 – Unique and strong.
• 60 – Stands out from the pack, but nothing extraordinary.
• 40 – Carbon copy. Same “equation.”
• 20 – Regression.
  

• Impact – Where is this band going? How will it impact your music collection? Do they have the "it" factor?
• 100 – This is top of the list material. An instant classic.
• 80 – This will be in regular rotation.
• 60 – Might be good for road trips.
• 40 – You might remember where you put it.
• 20 – Put this on the shelf and forget about it.